Media > Politics under and beyond OPTION I  

There are 3 sources from which a human can come

Human systems (individuals via relationships up to cultures can 1) parrot the Cm-media F1/4 F2/5 F3/6 F4/4 F5/3 F6/5 F7/6 F8/5 F9/2, take part in Bm- political    F1/1 F2/1 F3/2 F4/2 F5/1 F6/1 F7/1 F8/1 F9/2 power games, within the OPTION I Filter, or 2) come from the mAG-emotions, or 3) fulfill their awareness of their p=past, n=now-present, f=future in the 9 basic human functions F1-9 using their substance to fulfill OPTION II: OPTION I stems from what multiplies, in the media as communication (Cm), in politics, the legitimized, enforced (police) and defended, offensively or defensively (armed forces) the  boundary conditions (Bm). The media Cm-world cares for a 4-peaceful F1-input  sustained by F2-producing 5-good things in 5-good conditions and attempts to F3-output them as 6-very good with a corresponding marketing. Then F4-management can thrive in 4-peace. However, when F5-entrepreneurs, such as Putin, make their claims some people end up 3-unsatisfied at the cost of the target group and shareholders to whom an entrepreneur first needs to make convincing promises and then deliver. F6-controllers need to perform 5-good work to keep everything under control, so the F7-elite can exert a 6- very good influence to deserve their reputation and if things go wrong, the F8-necessity must be dealt with and handled with a 5-good immediate plan of action. The communication pointing to F9-basic  boundaries is considered 2-bad under OPTION I, meaning it should be be left to Bm-politics! And that can only result in hierarchies with at the bottom, 1-very bad boundary conditions for life-fulfillment, that are F4-managed 2-badly, which is 2-bad for F5-enterprises and the sort of F9-basic science, as exemplified by any “Evil Empire” such as the Soviet one from 1917-91. It was overcome in astonishing ways without a great war because there was a group of people around the German Egon Bahr (3Bm) and Mikhail Gorbachev (4Be), who related to each other not under the spell of OPTION I, but with their OPTION II mentioned in as (X). Similarly Charles de Gaulle (7Pp) and Konrad Adenauer (5Ov) overcame the century old terrible, World Wars  between France and Germany in that in mutual understanding. So let us look at today’s key players, Vladimir Putin (5Pm) and Barak Obama (6Ow): Putin obviously frames his F1-input towards his, under OPTION I, in relation to Russia’s c-profile, needing an 4-appeasing spin to grow. Obama with “YES WE CAN” between “the Bm/1 devil and the Cm/4 deep blue sea” needs to shape up with a S-relaxed way of t- thinking about the 2-bad state of the USA, so he remains capable of producing R-resolutions in his h-living space and the sphere of influence of the USA, which are both  in a 3-*un-satisfactory state. This leaves Putin using his F2-digestive t-thinking with his over the F2-filter top 6-very good mastermind spin phrases, such as “New- Russia”. Obama can count on his a-intuition in 3-dissatisfaction, which however appears as lacking a strategy. Thus Putin can make his F3- move aimed at 4-appeasing the situation in his backyard, the Ukraine, in his I-conceptual terms serving his h-sphere of influence in order to allow himself and Russia to !-become an essential power once again. But underneath, his a-intuition should warn him about a 1-very bad outcome if he moves beyond the point of no return! In this scenario Obama can c-profile himself and the USA among allies in 6-very good ways. This is a challenge to Putin to come up with a 6-very good R- resolution to F4-manage the crisis in order not to provoke a too 2-bad Cm-situation (soldier’s women), in which he would lose his face, to remain able to J-justify himself. Then it is Obama’s term to really p- perceive what allows for an honest 4-peace again. It must allow Putin  to S-relax in top of the F5-filter in F5-enterprises beyond just riding bare-breasted, going fishing and creating new oil deals with China. Otherwise his X-being can no longer handle what is 1-very bad in his world, provoking OPTION I. Then Obama would -4 freak out about the %1-political correctness that hinders him while Putin would get even more +2 greedy and provoke with more %6-spin aiming for a Bm- management lead of the Zeitgeist in his -4 frustration about the losing of %1 social compatibility... The rest, is about who gains and who loses F6-control, gains or loses in F7-influence, fulfills or fails in view of the F8-necessities in this decisive 21st century, and who is FIT421 to account for the F9-basics,  and who provokes disaster in ignorance and/or arrogance. If all goes well, Putin will allow the F9-basic b-balance of Cm-media and Bm- politics even when things go 2-bad, then Obama will be free to rise above the F9-filter with a 4-pacifying M-perspective for a future with 6-very good values, which can only be those of OPTION II...     

Become aware how your best intentions are

curtailed in the “best of all possible worlds” about

your function in life and society: