The Open Problem of Conversion

OPTION II, unlike the hypes under OPTION I so far have not converted

sufficiently to overcome the evilness the latter allows in its evolution:

He/she, who projects that it is all simple  does not want to understand WHAT IS, where it is beyond the own aspired flat and flattering mind society and thus projects an evil limit to him-/herself and others such as did Captain Francesco Schettino on the Costa Concordia, 1912, the greedy owner on the Titanic, 2011 in Fukushima, where the controllers were forced to adapt their reports to the simple minds of the managers, just as before the Challenger Disaster in 1986 the engineers had, resulting in seven astronauts getting fragmented in the sky above Florida, spin- doctored as an accident...   Real human beings are essentially open-ended generative in their innate principles which stems from their created past that has the potential of a desirable future fulfillment. This is personally demand- ing, challenging beyond what is, under OPTION I, socially compatible,  mere mass-attractively appeasingly evolving outer forms. However, this prevailing approach is a thinking catastrophe which fulfills itself in human catastrophes. Then its advocates and scribes are the first to interpret them in new ways to maintain their old positions as privileged OPTION I wardens, up to pre-trans-trappin say by crucifying those who disturb the peace among themselves and their freedom to indulge in power games like the past nobles enjoying it from the warlords outlooks or in their castles the news at tea time.   Under OPTION I, old dead forms, idols, once painfully created, or simply out of a post-modern anything goes mood, splashed on a canvas, later on can get incredible values in the art trade business.